NEW YORK (AP) – On Monday, President Donald Trump’s lawyers presented new arguments to try to block a criminal summons for his tax documents, calling it harassment of the president.
Lawyers have filed a rewritten lawsuit in Manhattan Federal Court to challenge the Manhattan Attorney’s summons on grounds they believe are consistent with how the U.S. Supreme Court said the lawsuit could be challenged.
They asked the judge to declare it “invalid and unenforceable.”
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court ruled that a Manhattan prosecutor could sue tax records from Trump’s accountant over his objections.
But the court said he could challenge the summons as inappropriate as any other.
Trump’s lawyers have argued that the president cannot be investigated while he is in office.
In their new court documents, Trump’s lawyers said the summons to his tax return was “wildly excessive” and “took into account the president’s persecution.”
They said the lawsuit required details of all of Trump’s assets in the U.S. and abroad over a 10-year period.
“Simply put, ask for everything,” the lawyers wrote.
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. requested tax documents in part to investigate how then-personal Trump lawyer arranged during the 2016 presidential race to prevent porn actress Stormy Daniels and model Karen McDougall from making statements about Trump’s statements. Trump denied these cases.
Vance, a Democrat, asked the Republican president for tax records from personal and corporate taxes for eight years.
The Supreme Court returned the case to a federal judge in Manhattan, who arranged for both sides to complete their legal arguments in challenging the lawsuit by mid-August.
Last year, the same judge ruled against Trump in a written statement that was upheld by the 2nd U.S. District Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court.
In their new court statement, Trump’s lawyers said that the tax summons “requires extensive documents related to every aspect of business and financial affairs of the president and many related entities – from banal to complex, from projects and memoranda to official documents. , from source documents to resumes ”.
They said it was wrong for Vance to look for records dating back to 2011, when he first investigated the events of 2016.
The lawsuit states that the lawsuit concerns organizations in California, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia and the District of Columbia. It says other affected organizations are outside the United States, including Canada, the Dominican Republic, Dubai, India, Indonesia, Ireland, the Philippines, Scotland and Turkey.
“Collectively, the lawsuit requires accounting and analysis of each asset and commitment of the president, including each of these legal entities,” the lawyers wrote, calling the request an “inflated demand to remove the president.”
A message asking for comment from Vance was left in his press office.
Source: AP News
Share price data is provided by IEX Cloud with a 15-minute delay. Chart cost data is provided by TradingView with a 15-minute delay.
This article is first published on Source link